One Hour One Life Forums

My educated guess is that when the home marker of your mother is set by her mother (your grandma), you won't get your mothers (and grandma) marker.

This feature is intended to be hard to execute.
We 'need' a way to remove stomps that will otherwise be there for a full hour.
With only a shovel needed, we get the whole "the berry farm is grieved" situation again.
That is why a more difficult recipe is added (which is pretty easy to do with multiple people, which encourages teamwork).

TL;DR This is just adding the berry-bush removal to milkweed.

Can confirm there is still a bug going on today.
There is a way you can scare the goose in the water, take out water, which make the goose get stuck in his swimming animation.
You can fix this by manually adding water. (the goose will pop out of the water again)
I'm not sure whether the pond refills itself when it's stuck.
I´ll try to reproduce it.

The ideal village has indeed all the biomes nearby, but when adding more biomes this will no longer be the case
In this case, villages will have different items which will allow trade between them.
This would be awesome.

What is important in my opinion, is that you are able to sustain a village in these biomes.
Otherwise nobody will settle nearby them simply because they would die of starvation.

Right now, the only sustainable biomes are:
Swamp: because of the water you can use to keep your carrot farm going
Desert: because of cactusfruit that regrows and the temperature bonus that makes you eat less

The biome that often gets picked by Eves is Grassland. This may have some food to start with, but will quickly run dry.

@Dishehs I'm not sure what you are trying to proof here. We already know the 'Q-system' is not fool-proof. Many 'bad' forum players have used Q to trick people into keeping them (looking at you Joriom )

I wonder what would happen if we tried to change the code letter. How long would it take for people to get up-to-date?
Will some people still use Q only because they saw other people do that before?

As a last note:

That is not my opinion. I never said such thing, simply because it is not true.
What I do believe is that there is a positive correlation between time spend on the forums and knowledge about the game.

I disagree with your opinion of "many elitist snobs in this community"
This is a simple way of telling your mother that you didn't just buy the game, spend some time on the forums and that you can be productive without much help from others, without spelling it out character by character (would be quite some work).

If you want to contribute to this discussion, please keep your post limited to saying "I think it doesn't work because you don't need an account and the password is too easy to acquire"

Should be an easy fix to change the attacking shot wolfs current state to match the attacking wolfs state.
Add a transition for the attacking shot wolf to shot wolf and remove the current recipe where you have to pet the attacking shot wolf.

Unless there is a real reason why we need give the attacking shot wolf our blessing so it can die in peace...

It looks like it outputs its current coordinates. It changed when he walked a tile southeast.
The first number (after the 666) looks like an increasing counter which displays his time alive (or client up-time).
I wonder why it actually moved (why southeast and not northwest?) and what it would accomplish given enough time.

It looks like mouflon lambs are a bit more restrictive than domestic lambs.
You can't re-rope them once released, that is the current state of the game (always has been), which makes this situation a mechanic.
I personally would like seeing this being changed to act the same like domestic lambs, but that is up to Jason to decide.

source: mouflon lamb and domestic lamb

edit: a word

Het klopt dat er inderdaad soms andere vertalingen worden gegeven. Dat komt vooral omdat wij in het Nederlands soms meerdere/andere woorden voor iets hebben. Nu is het een afweging van correctheid tegen consistentie.

^ Dit is namelijk duidelijk een muts/beany.

^ Dit echter lijkt er al een stuk minder op.

^ Dit is geen muts. (althans, ik vind het er niet op lijken)
Dat is waarom ik voor de algemene term van Hoofddeksel ging. (die ene keer muts moet ertussendoor geslopen zijn.)
Er zijn meerdere situaties waarbij ik niet van consistentie, maar van correctheid uit ben gegaan (denk aan Dennen/Grenen).

Daarom dat ik nu ook weer voor correctheid zou willen gaan, vraag is alleen; Welke term willen we gebruiken?
Mijn mening/voorstel is: Wol = muts, Bont = hoofddeksel (er zit echt geen vorm aan), Wolf = ??
Als iemand er een goed voorstel voor heeft, reageer vooral!

Helemaal mee eens, Bont is inderdaad de juiste term hiervoor, meteen veranderen!

Ik heb je een beetje op weg geholpen.
In een extra kolom staan nu ruwe vertalingen die gegenereerd zijn door algemene vertalingen, (bijv vervang alle "Sheep" door "Schaap").
Het vereist echter nog wel wat handwerk om alle vertalingen te vinden en de juiste grammatica toe te passen.