a multiplayer game of parenting and civilization building
You are not logged in.
Alias wrote:Gederian wrote:I think you are both right and just mad at each other.
Pies are needed when traveling and are a byproduct so you must make them. You got off on the wrong foot here, arguing two different points.
The low pip vs high pip argument is probably mute anyways. You can't really control the major variable (what people eat) so just preach about YUM! Berry in bowl is not the same as berry in hand!
Let's just all be friends and do octo eves!
Agreed. That's why when producing it's good to focus on maximum results at minimum cost. You can provide foods optimized for least waste or optimized for full bellies at similar cost. Latter is better, because that's the thing that counts in the game. If youcan make your village overflow with food from milk, mutton pie and turkey then you are all good and your family is set to die of nocturnal infertility and not of starvation
Sure if you wanna make a crap ton of milk and pies go ahead thats not what im arguing, my point is that you can make as much of them as you want, they are still going to be wasteful and so far apart from changing their pip values i havent seen another way to make them. Also if you make popcorn and pies at the same rate and cost its doesnt make sense to go with pies, at that point youd just be losing pips for the sake of arguing. If you wanna talk about pip efficiency thats one thing, but you gotta either bring in the rest of the variables that go along with it, or talk about that subject by itself, trying to do both at once is just counter intuitive and im pretty sure thats the main reason you've been arguing at me for so long about this, :L
Make all the popcorn you want. Milk will always give more food, no matter how "pip efficient" popcorn is. Even if you fed theoretical family of only newborns, milk will always give them more food than popcorn from the same amount of corn. And this is impossible, worst case. You can be efficient at minimizing waste, I will be efficient at maximizing actual calories intake with all waste factored in.
No alias, waste is much, much less weighted than actual cost of a food.
I've proved this in a post I just made.
I think we are on the same side here Booklat. Some foods have amazing value/cost ratio, like milk - or mutton pie which in reality costs 1/4 of water per pie in a city with active compost cycle so in any city that has anything going right.
Waste is such a small factor that it comes to play in edge cases when e.g. food has similar cost and total pips but spread over more bites.
Arguing for popcorn over milk from one cob because of waste is ridiculous. One person can eat all popcorn from one cob in one go while one sip of milk so 10% of one fob value will make person full or almost full. Let him have another sip.
End result is either:
- all popcorn eaten by one person that's still might be not full
- 10% or 20% of milk drank to full one person. Whatever was wasted, you still have 126pips from milk but popcorn is gone.
Waste is to go for popcorn over milk when you have neither and can make either.
I think you are both right and just mad at each other.
Pies are needed when traveling and are a byproduct so you must make them. You got off on the wrong foot here, arguing two different points.
The low pip vs high pip argument is probably mute anyways. You can't really control the major variable (what people eat) so just preach about YUM! Berry in bowl is not the same as berry in hand!
Let's just all be friends and do octo eves!
Agreed. That's why when producing it's good to focus on maximum results at minimum cost. You can provide foods optimized for least waste or optimized for full bellies at similar cost. Latter is better, because that's the thing that counts in the game. If youcan make your village overflow with food from milk, mutton pie and turkey then you are all good and your family is set to die of nocturnal infertility and not of starvation
As for that last bit i already refuted all of those points in a earlier post and you never replied back to them so idk why you are bringing them up again, and so far only two people have told me that, you, and destiny whom ive already replied to. Yeah i dont know how to make everything in this game, but that doesnt make what im saying any less valid if ive got the proof to back it up which i do, so instead of skimming over that and coming to your own conclusion, try to look at it from a neutral perspective instead of the one you got right now.
You put rabbit berry pie in top tier of your food list. And you think you refuted or proved anything...
Makeshift trial but its the best you can get.
Dude asked what is going when I said I was attacked and this clumsy griefer claimed I tried to kill him. I cursed Ase. I explained exactly what happened and countered when he claimed he wanted to skin rabbit (at my feet, with right click, already skinned).
Judge dude said he will not let that village to fall to griefer and wanted both out knives (I took his and he found another one). I said ok but he goes first. He refused, claimed i was rude. Then he started asking for pants xD.
I thought it would be it and he would get away with it - only later to attack again. But judge said he would give him pants for knife - clumsy refused and started talking about us being racist. And that was it, judge claimed he is guilty and 3 knives (he dropped his again...) chased him. It took like 30 seconds and avoiding being killed by griefer or other executioners I finally got him.
I like this decisive action by judge, he wasn't tricked to be pushed beyond "reasonable doubt" with those BS excuses and didn't give up. Only wish they all didn't let me to starve, but maybe they thought its better safe than sorry and let me die too...
Nice job server 2 on judging Ase as griefer and wannabe killer. Missed me and swapped knife for skinned rabbit instead claming he wanted to skin it
Cool headed dude made trial and when he refused giving up knife and messed around more he was found guilty. Execution was worse, 3 people chased him and I got him finally.
Good job guys, just wish ANY OF YOU FED ME AFTER THE EXECUTION SO I DIDNT DIE.
I was begging for food for almost a minute.
Pity, nice town, wanted to bring you cow and teach you the ways of milk (already showed magic of apron). Could be good life after that drama.
Feel free to curse Ase if you want for next 2 hours
I'm not worried about the math error you made in your initial post. I'm worried that you are still arguing that mutton pie is not a good food choice overall. You are still claiming that it might get wasted by inconsiderate or lazy villagers. The point of my post was that even in an absolute worst case scenario, mutton pies are superior to the available alternative.
There is a problem at the core of your food theory and the math related to mutton pies helps to illustrate it in a very clear way. I think you really need to take a step back and re-think your approach to pip efficiency if you want to identify which foods are really best for the village.
This. He will not abandon his "pip efficiency" theory. He created his own food benchmark where he claims that pip efficiency if key factor, but each tier in this benchmark has foods with both high and low "pip efficiency", showing that its non-factor.
But the best part is him putting rabbit berry pie in top tier. This is 4x18 and is huuuge waste on all fronts. With the same ingredients and less effort you can create rabbit pie which is 4x14 and still have bowl of goose berries so 6x5. This option is faster, gives more total pips, is more "pip efficient" and gives more bites.
And yet he put rabbit berry pie at the top Bravo!
Sorry, Crumpaloo, but it seems there's something lacking in your knowledge and approach to the game. You messed up how skim milk is made, same for pies in this thread, ommited total plant output when comparing beans and corn, admitted you can eat pie twice cause you don't care and now glorify pie that is sin to make like potatoes. More and more people tell you that, but you create more and more topics and posts in response. You might have many hours in the game, but your posts question how they were spent.
I played with some numbers for my own amusement and I'll reproduce them here, in case anyone else likes food-based math as much as I do.
There are three bowl-based foods in the game that provide the same over-all pips. A bowl of green beans restores three pips per use and can be used four times. A bowl of saurkraut restores 6 pips and has two uses. A bowl of turkey broth restores 12 pips and has just one use. Each of these food items will give 12 pips if consumed entirely, but the green beans and saurkraut are more "pip efficient" (and less time efficient) since the pips are spread out across multiple interactions. So let's consider a few scenarios to see how this affects food consumption and potential for waste.
Scenario 1 - Adult at 2 pips. Needs 18 pips to reach max bar.
6 uses of green beans gives 18 pips (maxed out) cannot eat again immediately
3 uses of saurkraut gives 18 pips (maxed out) cannot eat again
1 use of broth gives 12 pips (14 pips total) eating again would waste 6 pips.Scenario 2 - Adult at 4 pips. Needs 16 pips to reach max bar
5 uses of green beans give 15 pips (19 pips) eating again wastes 2 pips
2 uses of saurkraut gives 12 pips (16 pips) eating again wastes 2 pips
1 use of broth gives 12 pips (16 pips) eating again wastes 8 pipsScenario 3 - Adult at 6 pips. Needs 14 pips to reach max bar
4 uses of green beans give 12 pips (18 pips) eating again wastes 1 pips
2 uses of saurkraut gives 12 pips (18 pips) eating again wastes 4 pips
1 use of broth gives 12 pips (18 pips) eating again wastes 10 pipsScenario 4 - Adult at 8 pips. Needs 12 pips to reach max bar
4 uses of green beans gives 12 pips. (Maxed out)
2 uses of saurkraut gives 12 pips. (Maxed out)
1 use of turkey broth gives 12 pips (Maxed out).So what does all that mean? Well, it means that it is harder to waste pips when eating green beans, since each bite is so small, but you have to eat twice as many times, compared with saurkraut, and as much as five or six times as much compared with broth, which can get pretty tedious. More uses per bowl gives you more control over how much you eat, so if getting to full hunger bar is very important to you, small bite foods might be a better choice to avoid waste.
But waste only happens if you eat a big bite when you are too full (or too young/old). With a pip value of 12, one bowl of turkey broth will not cause any waste if you wait until your bar is under half, as an adult. It only becomes a problem if you are greedily slurping down a second bowl of turkey water right away, instead of finding a smaller bite, or waiting until you are hungry enough for seconds.
If you are a young child or elder, then turkey broth might be a bad choice. You would not want to eat this food (if you have any better options) when your max bar is less than 14, since the extra pips will be lost. While green beans are a viable food source at ANY age, since they restore the lowest possible pip value. There is hardly any wasted pips with this food and it is easy to max out your bar by eating a bowl or bowl and a half. The same is true for other low pip value "small bite" foods, like gooseberry or popcorn. They are relatively low waste snack foods that are a very smart choice for children and the elderly, due to their shorter hunger bars.
So why not feed your entire population on popcorn, green beans and berries? You technically could do that, and I have occassionally seen berry towns, but it is not a smart idea. Mutton pies are a nearly free byproduct of composting, which is essential for continued production of all crops. So if you are properly maintaining a berry farm or green beans farm or corn farm, you will have plenty of wheat and mutton available for pies. All varieties of pie (except carrot) are "big bite" high pip value foods. And they a highly portable, multi-use, and space effiecient. If you must leave your village, taking a pie with you provides an important safety net, in case, you run low on forage in a large barren biome. You can travel further, explore deeper into hostile zones, and return safely, with a warm pie in your pack.
So why not just eat pies and ignore everything else? Because the majority of pies restore over half your hunger bar as an adult (13+ pips), so if you run out of low pip value food (berry bushes are empty, no popcorn, etc), then you will start to see a lot of food waste. Too many pips lost when children or elders eat a big bite of pie, instead of a smaller bite of broth or saurkraut or bread or popcorn. All foods require time, labour, and resources to produce. The best foods pay out a large pip value for a relatively low investment. Whole milk and mutton pies are probably the best, with berries and popcorn as good low-pip options. Food items that require more work, special tools, time-sensitive harvesting, or limited resources are less ideal choices, but might be worth the extra effort when the town is stable and thriving.
I don't think the answer to food waste is greater "pip efficiency". I think the better answer is education and food variety. Let people know that there are other options and encourage people to eat smarter, not harder. And make sure that there are always enough low AND high pip value foods available, so that desperate hungry people are not forced to make bad choices.
Thanks for this data. You included bite count on every case, because this is the key to this. You want more pips per bite, and more bites per food product. If all foods were one-bite, then always more total pips would mean better food. So the bite count is the factor that adds some dynamic.
Sadly the more bites food gives, usually sad side effect is decreasing pips per bite. Usually, but not always. If you can go for food with more bites but each bite gives still a lot then you do that. That's the case with milk and turkey. They are OP-ish because they give massive pips per bite and many bites (for milk at similar cost as food giving less bites and less per bite).
I totally agree on education part. It should also be education to produce food smarter not harder. If village has corn, cow and bucket available, they should know that however good and efficient popcorn is, it's just better to go for milk (unless starvation is imminent). Sure, milk is more wasteful, but that's mark of the most OP foods. Noone cares, because one sip of milk gives more that all popcorn from one corn. More bites + more pips per bite = better food. Not less pips per bite.
DestinyCall wrote:If you intentionally eat a second bite of mutton pie, then you are a monster.
I refuse to believe that the "average" player is that stupid. I just refuse.
Its not that they are stupid, they just dont care, whos gonna try to do math in their head thinking of what foods in a certain order they should eat so they dont waste any pips? Not me, and if not me definitely not your average newbie, they would much rather take a second bite of a food thats already in their hand then put it down to go look for another one, and i cant even blame them.
Do you take second bite of pie immediately?? Monster...
New players can care, longer playing players can "not-care", apparently. But this is a bit extreme. It doesn't require doing math to realize that this is bad and is direct disservice to yourself, unless you only run naked, without backup, whole life in the village.
For the turkey you said that no other variables but the pip value would be decreased, so if you still got the same amount of pips at the end of making the turkeys then like i said before yeah it would be worth it because it would, changing anything else but the value of the turkey would be changing another variable which is what you said you didnt want so idk what your trying to prove here?
But seriously trying to imply that i think the pip efficiency would outweight the cost of decreasing the amount of pips in a food makes no sense. Decreasing the pip value of ANY food outright and changing nothing else is just losing pips. Sure the food would be more efficent but it doesn't matter now that you have just decreased it from its original value. Same scenario with Jasons flat bonus, wasteful or not those are free potential pips, and no other factors being changed its hard to understand why you would try to assume that that would be a bad thing. I never thought it was, nor claimed it in the first place, you did, so trying to assume i believe that when you yourself made the point in the first place has no merit whatsoever.
You were the one who claimed popcorn was better than green beans, because of it's "pip efficiency" and to because of its double pip value per plant. Double.
Ok, so then just what exactly was your way of improving turkey? Right now its 6 bites x 19 pips. How do you make it better? What you said suggest that e.g. 6 bites x 15 would make it better.
Pip Value affects Pip Efficiency, Pip efficiency is NOT affected with how many, uses,bites,or even number of the same food you have. One gooseberry flat out is more efficient then a cooked fish, you dont gotta add more uses, bites, or number of them to make it more efficient then a cooked fish, thats because the base pip value affects the pip efficiency of a item, NOT how many items,uses, or bites there are.
Define your "pip value". Because bowl of popcorn and bowl of turkey have the same pip value and popcorn is more "pip efficient" specifically because it has spread it across more bites.
This is because pip efficiency is determined
Also, what do you mean when you say improved? Are you talking about the efficiency of the food itself, if so just decrease the pip value of each bite of turkey to do that, and if were only changing the pip value of the turkey itself, and assume that no other variables would be changed, like the output of pips overtime, then yes lowering the pip value of the turkey would make it more pip effeceint and thus save more pips overall.
Definition is simple: with other things being equal better food is the one that provides more calories to civilization, keeps bellies full, saves from starvation, lets families live longer than onworse food. Your solution to lower pips per turkey bite does EXACTLY the opposite, just to raise your counterproductive "pip efficiency". Don't you agree? Removing pips from food makes it worse. You really think people would survive longer on pre bonus turkey? Really??
You keep dodging question about removing +2 flat bonus. Jason created it to make our lives easier, made all foods instantly better. But you know better? By your standards he made it worse because he decreased "pip efficiency" of every single food. So does more pips (aka less "pip efficiency") from flat bonus make our lives easier or worse? By your standards pre bonus turkey is better than post bonus turkey, which is totally ridiculous.
Anyone else thinks that the flat bonus makes all foods worse because it decreases "pip efficiency"?
It thing Loss Aversion is a factor here, both for food waste and yum loss:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_aversion
You may tend to prefer food A that causes less waste than B even if after loss B gives you still much more. And so marginal factor is blown out of proportion.
@pein, what's up with corn and cows? Where are cows? Each life in mid or high level town there is no cows. I spend more and more lives getting it and teaching people but it seems no one does it.
Cow allows you to turn corn not into 4x3 pips popcorn, but into 10x14pips milk (at worst). Why people don't do it?? With water even single person can turn one corn plant into 1000+ food.
@Crumpaloo
We are not going anywhere with this. Claiming that beans let you produce more food is just false. "Soil or not" is statement of ignorance. It takes double soil, hoe, space and water to match output of (pop)corn. That's huge difference. One corn plant yield can be split into different uses: raw, popcorn, stew, milk.
You don't choose skim milk because it looses you pips from the start. Good. You don't choose beans over corn for the same reason: its less pips from the start.
Do you think flat +2 bonus makes food better or worse? It makes all food less "pip efficient". Still I say it makes it better. What do you say?
Finally: it's not debate how to split fixed amount of calories to max efficiency, because foods don't have same amount. Some are ridiculously powerful. Popcorns 4x3 is perhaps best allocation of 12 pips, but it's totaly trumped by brute power of milks 10x14. "But popcorn is more efficient..." no, it doesn't matter. It's efficient in use of 12% of what milk has to offer at worst. Wow. Silver lining at best.
I will choose 10 buckets of milk over 10 bowls of popcorn any day. And I will put it next to berries for kids without batting my eye. It's just better use of corn despite at least 10 times more going to waste. That's sheer power of more pips and uses. Less pips has zero power.
With other things being equal better food is the one that:
Gives more uses.
Gives more pips per bite, NOT less. Less is never better. Never.
No food can be improved by decreasing its overall pips and not changing anything else. Show me otherwise and I switch side. Turkey is 8x19 pips. Huuuuuge waste hmm? Improve this food by only limiting its pips.
Alias wrote:Popcorn is not so glorified because it gives so little per bite! If it gave 4x5 it would be much better than current 4x3 which at the same time would make it less "pip efficient".
Popcorn is better than green beans because corn plant gives more food and in more bites than bean plant:
6 bean x4 food is all you get from whole plant = 24 food.
From corn plant you get 4 ears, each ear can give 4 pocorn bites, each worth 3 food = 48 food. Double what bean plant gives. That is the reason.
EDIT: If beans gave 16 bites per plant like corn, but still each bite would be 4 pips vs 3 pips from popcorn, you think beans wouldn't be better choice just because popcorn means less waste? Of course beans would be better, because even with considerable waste they would give more food than corn. Not 33% more, but more. And more is better.The more pips food gives per bite the better is the food.
The more pips food gives per bite the worse it's "pip efficiency".
When you equalize bite/portion count you get from food all that matters is raw pips: the more the better food is, and the worse it's "pip efficiency"
Conclusion: The better the food, the worse is it's pip efficiency".Well i dont doubt that increasing the value of a certain food for the same amount of effort is a positive, even if you are losing pips that would still be free pips if it were increased. As for the whole popcorn vs green beans thing, the pips you get from green beans can actually be made faster then the pips for popcorn. This is because of a couple things:
1. greenbeans grow in 4 minutes, and corn the same, however to dry the cob takes another 4 minutes which by then another set of green beans could already of been done
this put them both at about even produce
No it doesn't. It requires additional soil, hoe use, space, water,effort. You play down key factor of corn success.
2. because greenbeans require no steps to make them edible unlike popcorn where you need to shuck the corn, put it in a bowl, go find a fire, then pop it, it gives green beans zero down time between being fully grown, and ready to eat, making them produce food faster then popcorn with the down time on popcorn itself depending on how fast the guy making popcorn would be.
But that all being said id still probably pick popcorn because of how hard it would be to waste the food.
Really? That's why? If popcorn gave 4 pips per bite instead it would be less attractive to you?? Would you also pick skim over whole milk because of how easy is to waste food from whole milk?
For high pip foods, its not that they are actively bad foods, its that they are inherently wasteful because of how many pips one bite contains and several uses of a high pip pie are only gonna multiply that problem.
We don't minimize environmental waste in this game. We maximize calories intake. That's why less calories per bite is worse than more. We both have 10 empty pips you eat all your popcorn and now have no food plus you wasted 2 pips and broke your yum bonus. I eat my mutton pie, wasted 5 pips but have ton of food more. Yes, I wasted more, but it is you who will die of starvation. Your last words can be "my food was more pip efficient".
Good food is max food per bite and max bites per "package". There is no room here for "less pips per food is better" unless it comes from "more bites per package".
Bonus question: would you choose any food before +2 flat bonus over its current version? This bonus made all foods less pips efficient right?
Your reasoning is exactly the fallacy i want to deal with.
Popcorn is not so glorified because it gives so little per bite! If it gave 4x5 it would be much better than current 4x3 which at the same time would make it less "pip efficient".
Popcorn is better than green beans because corn plant gives more food and in more bites than bean plant:
6 bean x4 food is all you get from whole plant = 24 food.
From corn plant you get 4 ears, each ear can give 4 pocorn bites, each worth 3 food = 48 food. Double what bean plant gives. That is the reason.
EDIT: If beans gave 16 bites per plant like corn, but still each bite would be 4 pips vs 3 pips from popcorn, you think beans wouldn't be better choice just because popcorn means less waste? Of course beans would be better, because even with considerable waste they would give more food than corn. Not 33% more, but more. And more is better.
The more pips food gives per bite the better is the food.
The more pips food gives per bite the worse it's "pip efficiency".
When you equalize bite/portion count you get from food all that matters is raw pips: the more the better food is, and the worse it's "pip efficiency"
Conclusion: The better the food, the worse is it's pip efficiency".
That's awsome! Were you also crazy broth dude yesterday? Village of 6 people, 4 carved turkeys, 3 crocks of broth and two more empty crocks waiting. Amazing!
I would like to see two actual foods comparison where "pips efficiency" is deciding factor what to produce, without assuming production cost equal.
But still this example is good. What makes 4 berries better than one fish in some scenarios (not all of them, far from it!) is not how little pips each berry gives, but how many bites you have. You gain nothing from lowering pips per bite - you gain only from increasing bite count. Every single example for "pip efficiency" will include food with more uses, because this it the key to "pip efficiency" - not lower pips per bite. That is my point: there is nothing good from fewer pips per bite alone, contrary to popular argument. Single berry gains nothing from giving less pips than single fish if production cost was the same. That's why you included multiple berries - key factor is "more bites", not "less calories per use".
My counter example is simple: if producing 4 berries costed as much as producing mutton pie, which would you choose? After all berries are much, much more pip efficient. This example underlines that desired thing is more bites/uses, not less pips per use.
Bowl of popcorn or bowl of whole milk (with equal cost)? Now this is more of dilemma - because popcorn has more bites than milk, not because how little one popcorn bite gives.
BTW I never intentionally take second bite of pie mutton.
I think that "pip efficiency" should be important factor only when deciding what food to eat, not what food to make. All it means is "overeat as little as viable".
When producing you want to make most total calories at the least cost (least time, ingredients etc). By this standard berries, popcorn, milk, mutton pie, turkey broth are great foods to make and indeed they are, while they have different pip efficiency. When producing, "pip efficiency" could only matter in edge cases and specifically when comparing foods that give different amount of bites. Actually I cannot right now think of any such case where pip efficiency decides which food is better to make.
Also, what pein hinted, there is the matter of time. "Pip efficient" food is basically "time inefficient" and time is the most prescious resource in this game.
Whole milk - fat = skim milk + cream (aka future butter)
Thats basically the same as wasting pips by eating food that you dont need that much of so no it wouldnt be logical to try to make buttered bread unless you had nothing better to do.
Precisely. That's my point from the start. That's why buttered bread and skim milk is only made for yum (and fun... and paint) - even tough both those foods cause much less overeating waster than whole milk. But it doesn't matter because you overeat part of what skim + butter could never give you.
If at the same cost we could produce popcorn (4x3) and carrot rabbit berry pie (4x20) then it wouldn't matter that popcorn has amazing pip efficiency and pie has terrible efficiency and waste with every bite.
Until you get cow. The suddenly there are no buckets available...
+1 for diversity. That's why since I learned about awesomeness of milk I spend most of lives getting cow and with last minutes teaching about milk including water maneuver and butter. Apart from being super efficient on resources its great emergency food. No food and waiting for berries? Give me one dried corn, water and buckets and you will drown in milk! "Dried" part can be tricky so sometimes I carry it in backpack or hide behind a tree.
The thing about milk and skim milk is that as far as i know its the only food item where you have to add something to it to get less pips out of it. So with all of other foods needing to have something added onto it to make it contain more pips (buttered bread,pies,stew) it doesnt make sense to compare the milk/skim milk mechanic to the rest of the foods as you are taking a direct and obvious net loss in food by making skim milk where with others like adding muttion and wheat will get you a net gain in potential pips...
Quite the contrary. You create skim milk by taking out cream of it after it separates. So those lost calories go into butter.
Skim and whole milk are good example because of their similarities. If by same proces you can get food giving more pips or food with less average loss you should go for more pips obviously.
If sip of whole milk gave 20 pips it would make it only better even though each sip would be a waste. There is no downside to it. None at all.
Same with cooked fish: the fact that it gives 20 pips is its strength, just lowering to any value would never make it better.
Giving little per bite on any food is never an advantage. More bites is, less per bite is not.
I today was born in not super advanced village with pen. But there was lost of turkey lying around and crazy old man cooking broth. Awesome! Finally I made my first broth, can cross of my list. It provided lots of food even when we had influx of new players - I mean trying-bellows-on-fire new.
Sadly the family line ended there. But I manager to teach some stuff. Sound have switched fro survival to teaching earlier...
1. 2-4, maybe more if this doesn't waste more than 2 pips.
2. Pies
3. Not new
With production cost being equal I still stand that better food is the one that gives most bites and most food total. And it seems a no-brained. That's why whole milk is much better than skim milk, even though skim milk has much better pip efficiency -that would be true even if their production cost was identical (so no cream)
Chances of catching fish are lackluster. 60% chance to waste 5 seconds and need to recast, 15% chance to catch a fish, 15% chance to just lose your worm, 7.5% chance to catch a boot, 2.5% chance to lose worm + hook. So overall you have a 25% chance to lose the worm and get no return, 60% chance to waste time and reroll, or a 15% chance to get a fish. Unironically, you are more likely to strike oil than you are to catch a fish with each use.
Thanks! That's disheartening... But seems easy to buff, so maybe one day... I hope, because fishing is such a unique and flavorsome experience in this game. I want to make fishing expedition one day!
No, with skim milk specifically you would be putting more effort in for less food, now that im thinking about it it really comes down to 3 things:
. The effort put into making the food (for example sauerkraut requires alot of steps but something like a bowl of popcorn doesnt )
. The chance that a foods pip will be wasted (Pies are really bad for this and popcorn being the lowest pip food are the best)
. Pip/Tile Ratio (Basically whats the maximum amount of pips this food can be stored into on one tile)
The thing with popcorn is that although its easy to make, really effecient, it cant be stored into anything, as a result it has to be spread over multiple tiles making it a clutter, pies are the most effeceint storage food, only problem is that they require more effort then popcorn, and are one of the least effective pip giving food out there.
As for popcorn I don't get it: you leave it in bowl for others to get yum, no additional clutter.
As for milk, forget butter/cream for now, lets say whole milk just turns to skim milk. Would you ever make bucket of skim milk instead of whole milk, because skim milk means less food wasted on average? I know I would not. The only reason then would be yum. Even if it means more food wasted, whole milk is better, because you at most waste part of food that skim milk never had in the first place.
Its like saying "I don't want to be rich because if Im robbed I can lose more money than if I'm poor" (a bit simplified).
Your list needs more points to account e.g. for food created from byproducts of necessary process. Raw mutton pies are byproducts of composting plus water. This is huge factor why they are so awesome and common.
Odds are really bad. Usually getting worms costs more than what the fish is worth with the low chances. You can get: nothing, lost hook, boot, fish. Not sure if they share the odds or not. They may be even.
Such a shame! I imagine chilling while finishing, socializing, chatting with another player fishing - about stuff in or outside the game. Little competition who would best fisherman today. And getting nice reward by the way. I would like to see fishing becoming this one day.