a multiplayer game of parenting and civilization building
You are not logged in.
To all of those who say that the game is ruined, not all- didn't you realise that this game is in ALPHA? I knew what I was going to get. I came for the long-term enjoyment of a developing society, not a short-term instant gratification survival game like most. Realise that the game is in Alpha and FAR from finished, and you'll realise what I mean. To those who appreciate Jason Rohrer's work and are working through the temporary turmoil of the Alpha and Beta stages, good for you! We are players and testers. The game still has a long way to go. Have fun guys. I might even be your child once.
Got your point. I came to make a contribution to this game and have fun in it's developing states.
Okay, this is going insane. I have been giving recall comments and no one uses this still?! What is going on?
I don't want to kill the 666 babies.
I wont
okay, it's 10:02, and, Santan might want us to keep the 666 babies alive for as long as we can because the babies could learn how to live longer that way?
I haven't killed a Santan baby yet, though I have spawned as a Santan eve's baby once.
GOOD GOD! Why has this gotten so heated? The dude. Is. One. Person. Similar to the early days of Minecraft when Notch had a dev. team composed of himself! That's it. Just one dude. ONE. The game is in alpha, so, the issues, like Minecraft's, the game will improve over TIME. We have to wait. I will admit, even I'm a little annoyed at the difficulty. But, we all have to hang on. He is getting the game into shape right now, a very rough shape. It won't be like this forever! I mean, it was, he would have stated that it would stay like this. So, I think we need to hang on, and calm down, the game is only a clay mold of its future state.
I'm one of the more persistent less players since I play every day or few so, I only do it for a few hours because the Narrow virus makes it really hard for my eyes and head not to hurt after "staring" at a screen for an hour or two.
I am not dumb, or dum.
Well, It be halarious of someone to name someone Dead Inside.
- Chain Smoker
eat's M U S H R O O M S
I usually keep my first baby and then run to a good spot to make B A S E
Why hasn't there been any activity on here lately?
Weird, I died in one life in between the age of 40 and 38.
AW! There wasn't a Bruce Lee though!
You're not alone, I lose connection alot.
So, I grew up in a struggling village in one of the lives, and had an older sister. She got babies, but so did I. Unfortunately, when I had my first black child, I had discover my older sister was stabbed. I forgot what she told me, but she asked me along the lines "Keep the village alive." Then my first black kid in that life, who was a girl, ran away. So I was the only woman left. I couldn't keep my older sisters request too because, as the title said, Jake stabbed me, and so I attempted to tell who did it, but bled to death trying.
Who was Jake on the forums, and bonus, who were my children?
But there's a catch, this is just a game that comes bought through someone's wallet. And, it is just a game/ social experiment. Potjeh, I gotta say, you steam a good idea. Rather than outright perm or temp banning players we could use Potjeh's idea instead. Or, we can just understand that this is a game, and murderers or either people like Joriom are either A. to prove point aka Joriom, B. being an ass that can be ignored, C. experimenting (which I will be a murderer soon, so if you die to some dude with a bow or knife, it might be me trying to experiment with murdering), or D. being an ass that CANNOT be ignored. The D. 's are the ones that are to be dealt with. But Potjeh's idea also serves the good people too, which is what I like about it.
Did the msuhrooms get in the breast milk? I have eaten mushrooms (ingame) before, and there are multiple viarities! Plus they make the game trip balls (so don't, just don't, I nearly starved in one life just because of eating a mushroom.)
Here's what i'm saying - I agreed with pein's statement of "As for getting killed I really think it is made correctly. As an unarmed person, you really should not stand a chance against the armed one." The common sense part, in more realistic terms, imagine a 13 year old trying to defend himself against a 16 year old bully with brass knuckles. The kid would get knocked out (or killed) unless the 13 year old victim was some 13 year old Bruce Lee.
This is quite similar about a thread that was talking about genetic mixing, where asexual reproduction would be removed and "sexual" reproduction would be added in. Skim the forums, and if you see a title similar to this one click on it. If it isn't what I'm talking about, keep skimming the forums for similar titles, but the ones who also have genetic ideas. Lots of people are considering this idea in the future.
Realisim and common sense, Potjeh. A person left with his fists wouldn't bear much of a chance against some psychotic woman who has a knife and bow.
Imagine that, some kindergarten aged villager or civilian attempting to beat the gore out of some 16 year old with a bow. It wouldn't end well (AKA the 5 year old villager or civilian would get his head pierced by a arrow, leaving a disgusting corpse.) Unless you could disarm the armed one, you shouldn't stand much of a chance.
Q, D
I'm a forums and discord person.